How to end the debate on "cult brands" v/s "iconic brands"?

One of the biggest debates in the marketing and advertising circuits for a while has been on what makes a brand cultish?

Any popular brand, which is not cultish, is generally considered an Iconic brand. Well, does this call for debate or clarification? I am only qualified to do the former, let me try and put forth my understanding and learning before I let others to vent theirs.

Whether the brand has a cult / iconic status or not, it must definitely stand the test of time. Both these statuses demand a brand to stand for values beyond functionality and must be rooted in popular culture and find a place in people's lives over a long period of time.

Cult Brands: Apple, Volkswagen, Harley Davidson, Star trek and Benetton.

The word "Cult" originated from Latin word "Cultus" meaning worship or religious practice. And by extension it had started to connote the cultural aspects of religion like rituals, ceremonies, myths and personal sacrifices, miracles etc. Only later "Cult" started being associated with obsessive to faddish devotion to a religious myth or a religious leader or object of such devotion.

Now let's look at contemporary meaning of "Cult" in the context of brands:

Cult brands are the brands that dare to be different and celebrate that difference, and therefore possess the power of the loyalist, who come together on a common ground for the common values and ideologies.

Cult brands are the brands, which are more evolved to just talk about functionality, or the benefits of the category they peg themselves much higher in the human value systems, like upholding truth, honesty, simplicity, perfection and goodness. They intelligently tap into innate reserves of human consciousness.

"Star Trek" became a cult by being a crusader of human rights, by juxtaposing humans and aliens, war and peace, racism and space born humanitarians, all in an adventure story of planets and space.

Volkswagen" achieves with Beetle, all with utter common sense and Harley with its irreverence sense of fantasy and adventure. Apple does this with its childlike simplicity and perfection, producing magical joy to the end user.

Now try to fit any Indian brands? Mahatma Gandhi? Osho? Thums Up? Old Monk? Royal Enfield? Rajinikanth? Mona darling? It's your turn to pick...

Iconic Brands: Coca Cola, Nike, McDonalds, Lego, Rolex, BMW Mini, Marlboro and Vespa.

A purist definition of "Icon" means an image; a representation of a sanctified personage; an important and enduring symbol; an object of great attention and devotion.

As mentioned earlier Iconic Brands possess the ability to transcend from product benefits, to become part of people's lives and of their popular culture. And they also have the ability to tap into collective desires and anxieties of people. For instance Rolex taps into the desire to be successful, Coca Cola taps into the emotion of happiness, Marlboro into the need of freedom, Lego into the need of imagination for children.

Therefore, the brands endure as long as the human needs exist, and over a period of time they become synonymous with the values to become "Objects of desire or devotion.

Let's try to fit some Indian brands: Tatas? Amitabh Bachchan? Sachin Tendulkar?

Godrej? Raymond's? Wills? Bajaj? Hero? Scooty? Nalli's? MTR?

While there will be less debate on what makes a brand Iconic or Cult like, I recon there will be a heated debate on which Indian brands can make it to the list.

The debate has just begun.